"Unfortunately, many people believe the opposite—that money spent on development is wasted, or that it doesn’t get lasting results. Melinda and I will spend a lot of time in the coming year explaining why they’re mistaken. The relatively small amount of money invested in development has changed the future prospects of billions of people—and it can do the same for billions more if we make the choice to continue investing in innovation."

Bill Gates in his Annual Letter for 2012, which is a fab read on the latest innovations and priorities for development in poor communities around the world


The award winning documentary, Good Fortune, takes a critical look at aid work, particularly in Africa, and raises the questions anyone working in aid and development should be asking themselves. Essential viewing:

GOOD FORTUNE explores how massive, international efforts to alleviate poverty in Africa may be undermining the very communities they aim to benefit. Through intimate portraits of two Kenyans battling to save their homes from large-scale development organizations, the film presents a unique opportunity to experience foreign aid through the eyes of the people it is intended to benefit.

So you want to volunteer overseas? Read this first

It sounds great, doesn’t it? Give up all your wealthy trimmings, put on your sensible outdoorsy clothes and become one with “the locals” in an exotic location like Cambodia, Papua New Guinea or Uganda.

You want to give back, right? Atone for the accident of your birth which saw you born into a wealthy, democratic country like Australia, the Lucky Country no less. You’re probably young, not too tied down by mortgages and kids, the timing is just right to drop it all and become a volunteer in a developing country.

BUT WAIT…

What happens when you work for free?

What do most developing countries have in common? Unemployment issues. And what do a lot of short term volunteering programs offer well-meaning, rich country volunteers? The chance to work for free on a project which will “help” a poor community.

Build a house in Guatemala! Build a school in Ghana! Help maintain a rainforest in the Amazon! But think about it - if you’re willing to go and do it for free, and in most cases actually pay for the privilege of offering your hardworking self to work in poor communities, what happens to the local population in their fight for jobs?

And this is before we even touch on more complex issues like cultural appropriateness of buildings, maintenance and upkeep, land titles and whether or not the building is actually what the community itself wants or needs.

What happens when you leave?

Sub Saharan Africa has experienced horrendous loss of life, destruction of communities, lost inter-generational knowledge and so much more due to the AIDS epidemic. Millions of children have been left without parents and orphanages are common. They’re common, too, in South and South East Asia, and a lot of them are run by foreign charity groups.

Orphanages often seek the help of volunteers to look after the children, for some this is the only way they stay in business. In exchange for room and board, volunteers work in the orphanage day and night, sometimes for two weeks, sometimes for two years.

Can you imagine what this is like for the children?

A constant stream of new faces. Constant uncertainty. Detachment. Short term relationships and the knowledge that everyone leaves eventually. And we haven’t even touched on the quality of education, child protection, and the destruction of local social bonds orphanages foster.

The reality is that families and communities are generally great at stepping in and looking after their own, albeit with outside support of services where necessary. And many children in orphanages aren’t even orphans. Of course there are cases where there really is no one to look after a child, but these cases are rare, and orphanages disempower communities and often do more harm than good to the very children they are trying to protect.

This is people’s lives we’re talkin’ about here

Would you let your children be educated by the lovely teenager down the street rather than go to school? Do you want your house built by someone with a degree in global economics, or nursing, or communications, in two weeks? My guess is no – and neither do people in poor communities. 

What am I saying in this post?

That short term volunteerism often does more harm than good, and it is CRUCIAL you do your research before volunteering your time and money in a developing country, because not all voluntourism is bad, but enough of it is to warrant THE SOUNDING OF ALARM BELLS.

Here are three resources to get you started:

No matter how good your intentions are, good intentions are simply not enough.

"

But the sense that the aid agencies are employers not helpers, who probably do more harm than good, is widespread and deep-rooted. In the very popular memoir, The Last Resort, Douglas Rogers quotes a local aid worker who had previously run a tobacco farm where he had to deal with poor soil, frost, infrastructural maintenance and the livelihoods of four hundred workers and their families:

“Now? I drive around in a white Land Cruiser handing out shitty imported maize seed to poor buggers who don’t know how to farm it. Then I collect a salary in US dollars. It’s not very moral and it doesn’t make me feel very good, but it’s easier than farming.”[14]

Or, in the words of another friend of mine (who depends upon aid agencies to fund her work in rural communities, and so doesn’t want to be named):

“They spend millions but they make no constructive difference. They just meet their funders’ benchmarks and get paid. They are parasites on the poor.

"

— A comprehensive article on the negative impacts of aid by Diana Jeater, writing from Harare, Zimbabwe ‘Parasites of the Poor? International NGOs and Aid agencies in Zimbabwe.

Kill your (female) darlings

I don’t like writing sensationalist headlines, but sometimes there is just cause. The stats are out for India’s 2011 census, and the news is not good for girls. They are being killed in ever greater numbers, as the preference for boys intensifies:

In many ways, son preference is the starkest indictment on the status of women in the country. When parents make the choice to abort their unborn daughters, it is the crudest expression of a society’s shared belief that women are neither equal to men nor will they experience the same opportunities. The reasons for the son preference can be traced to social norms that are deeply entrenched within…societies that have “strong economic and social incentives to raise sons and eliminate daughters.” - India Journal: No Country for Women

In my work I speak to thousands of Australians about poverty, and explain the reasons why focusing on women and girls in developing countries is so essential.

The reality is that baby girls are being killed. If they survive birth, they are fed least and last in their families. If they reach childhood, they miss out on school and develoment opportunities. Then they are married too young. When they are married, they miss out on essential healthcare and nutrition in pregnancy, childbirth and beyond, and too often die. In wartimes and emergencies they are sexually and physically abused.

It doesn’t have to be this way. It shouldn’t be this way. Here are three solutions you can be part of right now to help:

International Development in (almost) 7 links

·  When is a $300 house a bad idea? Otherwise known as Bad Aid In Action!

·  One for the statistic and data nerds among us – poverty in the era of data and why monitoring and evaluation (M&E for the acronym lovers) is the catchphrase of the day

·  The 100 Social Enterprise truths – complete with  a pic of a granny lighting up. Seriously.

· What do intestinal worms have to do with getting kids into schools? (Otherwise known as ‘Getting smart about aid”)

·  Working in the arse-end-of-nowhere in the name of delivering aid – aka an insight into the lives and minds of International NGO field workers.

·  A good news story from Karonga, Malawi from the folks at Water Wellness (p.s. keep the challenge of governance in the back of your mind when reading this one)

· Oxfam launches its GROW program with Scarlett Johansen, Desmond Tutu and others, to international fanfare (think food crisis). 

· (And just so we remember what we’re up against here, they New York Times appoints its first female editor ever, after 160 years)

7 links on international development this week

·         One in three Africans is now middle class

·         Did you know  baby carrots are actually junk food? (This is more relevant to development than you think)

·         One third of the world’s food goes to waste – which is particularly interesting given the current world food crisis.

·         Could a global databank warn of natural disasters – and thus save lives?

·         More than 1 billion people are hungry in the world? – One of the best articles I’ve ever read on food security. Ever.

·         Measuring how or why aid works, or doesn’t Two new books on aid and development (and a review of them here in case you don’t actually want to read them)

·         Just how dangerous is sitting all day? (Gulp)

[image: sitting down all day]

10 links from international development world this week

So I used to have this weekly “Weekend Reader: Links I loved” regular feature on the blog. But somehow, with everything that has been going on in 2011, I have been struggling to maintain the link love.

In response, I’ve decided to change the format and extend to this blog the links I collate for my work colleagues. This means that, at least initially, they will be a bit more international development focused than usual, but I think that’s ok.

Link Love:

·         The World Bank has launched a map which visually tracks its projects and funding in a bid to better monitor impact and improve transparency.

·         The latest buzz in development circles is really focusing on aid transparency, and this article by Global Development’s Owen Barder is a good place to catch up on the debate (it’s only 3 pages long and has pictures!)

·         Coke analyses its “Poverty Footprint” – an interesting direction for corporate social responsibility

·         A bedtime story for the world economy by development economic genius Dani Rodrik. Globalisation 101 for emerging economies (and a follow up explanation in case you want more)

·         Great quote on understanding food security coming out of the Global Poverty Project’s Live Below the Line campaign (which is currently running and has Hugh Jackman as an Ambassador) (Rachel Hills)

·         How the news was broke about Osama Bin Laden’s death (and what that means). Also, have you heard that someone unknowingly tweeted the whole thing live from Pakistan?

·         REWIND: This is one of the best ever things I’ve seen on health and statistics by the genius demographer Hans Rosling. It’s a TED talk from 2006, and is still fascinating.

[image: Melbourne in Autumn is stunning right now!]

Emotionally numb?

 

Last night I was working at a ‘Youth to Youth’ forum talking about international development, my experiences as a volunteer in Bangladesh, and the work CARE Australia does with poor and vulnerable communities around the world. As far as work goes, it’s not a bad gig. I love that it’s part of my day job to meet new people all the time and talk about poverty, women and the opportunity we have to end extreme poverty in our lifetime. It’s a subject I never tire of – or at least I haven’t yet.

But last night I was asked if, after working in international development for a while, and having lived in and travelled through developing countries, whether I have become emotionally numb towards it all.  My first reaction was to say “Absolutely not!” At the time I went on to talk about the incredible experience of seeing development in action, and the transformations that occur when people emerge from extreme poverty as per the ‘script’. If I’m honest, though, I didn’t actually think about the answer really.

Until this morning when I read this article about maternal health in Afghanistan which tells the story of 35 year old Rogul who lost eight babies prematurely, and her ninth baby boy died within 24 hours of being born, though she carried him full term.

And when I read the story of 14 year old Hena who was whipped to death in Bangladesh after being found guilty of having an affair with the man who actually raped her.

Both stories left me horrified today. Cut to the core. Furious. Upset. Frustrated. Impassioned. And definitely not numb.

What a relief. 

[image: what maternal health can look like, Bangladesh 2009] 

Motivation - is yours all wrong?

Me ‘on the job’ and loving it, Bangladesh 2009.

I recently read this post on the motivation of aid workers by one of my favourite aid blogs Tales from the Hood. Naturally, it got me thinking about my own motivation for getting involved in the international development scene. First, a quote from the post:

“I meet many people who think of humanitarian work as a “calling.” Maybe they’re called by God. Maybe they feel guilty for having been born into wealth. Maybe they want to “give something back.” Very often they see the life of a humanitarian as a series of sacrifices that they somehow feel compelled to make.” - TFTH.

Do I feel like my decision to move into humanitarian work was a ‘calling’? Er, no. But I did identify, to a degree, having feelings of guilt at having been born into wealth, and while I didn’t think of this kind of work as giving back, I did consider it part of my intention to ‘contribute positively’ to the world.

Tales from the Hood continues on to be quite scathing towards people who think working in the humanitarian field is some kind of sacrifice they are making, worthy of special reconigition from everyone who chooses to stay home in comfy suburbia.

“Using the language of sacrifice to describe aid work implies that you are somehow entitled to something from those who did not make similar sacrifices. Maybe respect. Maybe appreciation. Maybe a raise. Maybe a break on your check-in luggage fees.” - TFTH.

And I agree that this attitude is troubling, but where I disagree is that I don’t think this attitude is such a problem initially.

When I first started working in development, I was definitely aware of a sense of theoretical sacrifice involved. I gave up a well-paying job I loved that included a great career trajectory and an excellent boss who was also my mentor. I gave up my share house, which had been the centre of my social world, and said goodbye to friends and family I knew I wouldn’t see for a long period of time (and yes, I got a break on my check-in luggage fees).

But alongside all this ‘scarifice’, I knew I was gaining some incredible things as well - an international career, the experience of living in another country, a big-leap-forward in professional experience, and all with the security of being supported by my government and a large international development organisation. Depending on which mood I was in, I was either making a sacrifice or accepting one of the best career and life opportunities I had ever been offered.

Of course the reality was a mix of both. And you know what? I don’t mind it that way. Once I actually started working, I never ever thought about the choices I made being anything like ‘sacrifice’ again* - I loved my job way too much.

While I take the point from Tales in the Hood that the motivation people have for the choices they make matter, I disagree that everyone needs to make decisions the same way and for the same reasons in order for it to be ‘right’. I don’t mind what path you take to “be the change you want to see in the world” if it means that you are actually contributing positively to the world around you.

And while my own motivations may have began from questionable origins, according to Tales from the Hood, they very quickly shifted. I went from feeling the need to ‘contribute’, to wanting to continue working in development because I love the day to day tasks of what I do. I love being involved in work which seeks to empower some of the most vulnerable people in the world. I love seeing the process of development itself. I love sharing my passion with people I meet as part of my job public speaking.

And quite simply, I love the feeling of waking up every day and looking forward to another day at work.

As for motivation? It takes all types. It’s not what got you started that interests me, but what keeps you there that matters most.

*Ok, maybe once I did at 3am with my head hanging over a dirty toilet bowl in a strange town in a remote community a twenty hour drive away from my bed, the nearest doctor, and my full medical kit, but that was only once, I swear.

A rare reblog, but it looks like Casey has saved me my own post on similar challenges. I understand the tensions, the contradictions, the disappointment and despair that go hand in hand with there being no absolute way to ensure the outcomes of your actions will be positive. 

caseymccarthy:

I’m finding it difficult these days to write about my life, my studies and my work in development in Cambodia. 

This is for several reasons. First, I like to write about what I see and do and the emotions it elicits, but predominantly my work is strategic communications, advocacy and media engagement. I’m not out visiting projects in rural villages of Cambodia, seeing projects being implemented and seeing for myself the reality, and changing reality, of life for 90% of people who live in poverty in rural Cambodia.

Second, I need to be sensitive to the professional and political context within which I’m working. The Cambodian Government recently passed a Penal Code that virtually allows them to fine or imprison anyone who speaks out against their policies and actions. As a foreigner I’m almost entirely exempt from this concern, but I do need to be careful that the views expressed here are not linked to my job and derail the work we’re doing.

Third, I’m learning so much every day on the job that it’s hard to find a place to begin. Pick somewhere, Casey. Anywhere.

And finally, but most importantly, as I’m studying my Masters, I’m learning so much about development theory that every day makes me question what I’m doing.

Reading, reading, so much reading. I’m reading everything from Kristoff’s Half the Sky, Neverdeen Pieterse’s Development Theory and Paulo Freire’s Pedogogy of the Oppressed to Dambisa Moyo’s Dead Aid and Bill Easterly’s White Man’s Burden. A large, dark cloud has been cast over my usually very persistent optimism and idealism about aid and development and our pursuit of the eradication of extreme poverty.

And the reading is absolutely necessary. It’s critical for development workers to always be learning –what failed in the past, what lessons from those failures can be learnt and reflected in future interventions, about increasing participation and community-led development (in ways that aren’t just meaningless catch phrases), about trends and priorities and successes elsewhere in the world.

And outside of my theoretical reading, there are endless blogs and websites already contributing to the online aid and development discourse. How am I, with my limited experience, to contribute to this in a new and unique way?

Not to mention the minefield of disputed terminology that one should always be careful to avoid – words such as ‘beneficiary’, working ‘in the field’, colonial and imperial discourses including ‘North v South’ and ‘Developing v Developed’.

I suppose the issue is that in the process of all this learning, there is a dawning realization that I know so little. I sometimes feel like a complete imposter. Like someone who is expected to know everything about communication for development, about development theory and the delivery of aid. But I don’t know it all.  I’m still learning. Yet, somehow I expect of myself absolute perfection.

And because absolute perfect is not achievable, I am as a result censoring myself (which in fact is what many foreign journos here accuse their Khmer counterparts of doing). I’m careful of not wanting to say the wrong thing, jeopardizing my (fledgling) credibility and professionalism.

I found great comfort in this blog post by Tales From The Hood (and many of his other posts too actually).  He says “Few of us would ever dream admitting that we’re all in this searching as well. We’re supposed to be coming to this whole aid thing with all the answers. It is hard for us to acknowledge that just like a suburban divorcee taking some time away, we’re also looking for meaning.”

The reality is that we will always continue to learn and grow and realize that what we’ve said and done in the past is stupid and naïve (and sometimes hopefully too, inspired and genius!). But learning from our mistakes is an important skill to have. So I commit myself to blogging and to learning from my mistakes along the way!

Well, I’m glad I’m not Tony Abbott this week

It’s fair to say that Tony Abbott is having a rough week, and while I’d like to say “buck up champ,” “shit happens,” I won’t because that would be taking a cheap shot, which is something I would never do.

Instead of that I’m going to tell you about a conversation I had with a taxi driver on Tuesday morning. He was driving me to the airport and en route we were listening to Tim Costello, CEO of World Vision, explain why Abbott’s policy of delaying foreign aid to help pay for QLD’s recovery was (is) selfish and wrong.

For about fifteen minutes the driver and I discussed love, bipartisanship, the connectedness of the world, and the distance between the football game our political representatives spend so much effort convincing us we are watching and the nuanced shades of grey in which we actually live. “You’re supporting the wrong team!” “They’re cheats!” “The ref is blind!”

It’s insulting.

“Let’s make the world a better place, let’s have more love. Let me pay my 1% to help people put back together the pieces of their lives,” the driver said as I signed the receipt and tipped my hat. I liked this man.

The next day I asked a group of year 12 students in Queensland whether they thought it made sense to take care of our own first before spending money to help people we don’t know on the other side of the world. We debated the genuine merits of such an argument, but the students kept coming back to the fact that we have the capacity for more.

We have the capacity for more, for the people rebuilding in Queensland and Perth and the students in Indonesia and the other people both near our borders and beyond who benefit from Australia’s foreign aid.

But don’t just take my word for it - I’m not the only one who thinks cutting foreign aid can only harm us all*.

*Full disclosure, I work for CARE.

[image by the talented Hayden Jose]

"The reality of aid work is that it is a lot of text- and spreadsheet-bitchery. It is a lot of hunching over a laptop computer, late at night in sweltering heat (or bitter cold) banging out a report to satisfy a needy internal constituent who fails to understand the context. It is a lot of meeting donor reporting deadlines in particular donor formats. It is a lot of arguing with people who see the world very differently. It is a lot of trying to understand, and then explain why things have not gone as planned. It is a lot of documenting what has been done (text bitchery) and communicating what one plans to do (more text bitchery). It is a lot of re-re-connecting to the internet every 7.3 minutes so that you can continue your skype conversation because some cubicle-farmer at HQ is forever riding your ass about your international cell phone bill. It is about keeping the demons of ethnocentrism sufficiently at bay that you do not totally alienate the local staff and counterparts with whom you must work (because no matter how cool or awesome or even hot they are, there will come a day when they totally piss you off, and rightly or wrongly, in your heart in a moment of weakness you’ll blame their culture)."

Tales from the Hood on the reality of being an aid-worker.

Weekend reader - links I loved

star

Our house is starting to smell a lot like Christmas…

What’s the most effective development intervention we know? Tip - it has serious implications for immigration policies - Chris Blattman

Is it time to call it quits on the Euro? I hope not, but…

“…you cannot achieve monetary union, among democracies, without political union…It is a very sad story for one of this century’s boldest economic experiments.” - Dani Rodrik

Are you internet famous? Another great artwork by Gaping Void.

I’ve been reading about the “sex by surprise” charges apparently being waged against Wikileak’s front man Julian Assange? Not so simple, says Jessica Valenti in this excellent blog post.

“Now, I have no opinion about Assange’s innocence or guilt – we don’t know shit about it.  But I hardly think that accurately reporting the charges against him is some sort of militant feminist conspiracy.  Because of the irresponsible reporting of AOL News, the truth has been muddied and even lost; even worse, women who may be rape victims have been lied about, smeared and trashed the world over.” - Jessica Valenti

Speaking of WikiLeaks, I’m very glad I don’t work in diplomacy or for a nasty, unethical mega company like Shell right now:

[Shell’s] top executive in Nigeria told US diplomats that Shell had seconded employees to every relevant department and so knew “everything that was being done in those ministries”. She boasted that the Nigerian government had “forgotten” about the extent of Shell’s infiltration and was unaware of how much the company knew about its deliberations. - The Guardian

Have you heard about Amazon’s (shocking/exciting/overdue/utilitarian/depressing) decision to show authors just how many books they’re selling:

“For the vast majority of authors, whose books have been out for six months or three years, the live recent data is just upsetting…And it’s freaking out publishers, too…” - The Awl.

I chuckled and sniffled my way through Tao Lin’s 10 Bleakest Unpublished Blog Posts from 2009 -

“raw organic veganism is scary to me, it seems like selling all my possessions and giving my money to a charity and moving into the forest or to live on a farm, without internet access or a cell phone; training for ten years in an isolated institute funded by the government to be an astronaut that lives alone in outer space for the rest of my life; or living in africa and being in a tribe that values long necks and adding rings to my neck each year to make my neck longer…i feel afraid of 100% of anything, maybe” - Tao Lin

Earlier in the year I was freelancing from home as my only workplace and I found it really lonely and isolating (granted, the home I was working from was in the middle of ‘suburban hell’ where the only coffee around was at the nearby McCafe). So the idea of coworking is really appealing to me:

“It seemed I could either have a job that would give me structure and community,” … “or I could be freelance and have freedom and independence. Why couldn’t I have both?”

Enter the idea of coworking:

coworking creates a “third place.” “Something which is neither a desk in a company nor the domicile of the person; it is a kind of public place you can join when you want, with the guarantee of finding some social life and the chance of a useful exchange.” - Dominique Cardon and Christoph Aguiton via PSFK

The ten weirdest animals of 2010 is not the kind of thing I’d normally link to, but the creepy-but-cute looking ‘Yoda Bat’ is just too intriguing not to share.

Looking for free Christmas cards to send online? You can’t go past Someecards for the most inappropriate cards you’ll send all season.

Lastly, Happy Holidays!

Is ‘The Amazing Race’ really better than poverty porn?

There is quite a debate raging at the moment about poverty porn and the negative imagery and stereotypes many charities use to raise money.

Over at Wronging Rights there is a discussion about the positive portrayal of “the real Ghana” in the American reality TV show The Amazing Race (TAM) acting as an ‘antidote to poverty porn.’

I recently saw the episode where contestants go to Dhaka, Bangladesh, and I was also impressed with the depiction of one of the most populous cities in the world where poverty is visible on every street.

Wronging Rights praises TAM for showing Americans struggling to do things Ghanains do every day, showing a positive and cheerful side of Ghana, and showing realities like traffic jams and homes with TVs.

In Ghana, TAR confounds expectations by doing the exact opposite. It (a) shows bumbling Americans; (b) highlights the lives of Ghanaians in Ghana; (c) rejects poverty porn. - Wronging Rights

There is an acknowledgment that the comments coming out of the mouths of some of the contestants are pretty awful:

I hope I get to hold little African babies” - a female contestant.

But there is much support for the depiction of a different side of Ghana than one portrayed by fundraising charities (I use ‘different’ as opposed to ‘real’ because there are many versions of the ‘real’ sides of places - but that’s a whole other blog post on its own).

My problem with this argument is that this TV show does a better job at portraying people living in Africa than charities who use poverty porn because it is like comparing apples to oranges - we’re talking about completely different things.

The purpose of The Amazing Race is to entertain. It is not a documentary, it is a competition, and it most certainly not reality.

How can this be compared to a fundraising appeal which seeks to raise the money needed to fund aid projects? While it is wonderful to think that portraying entertaining, happy, funny images of developing countries and that being enough to inspire people to dig into their pockets - fundraising departments are often skeptical at how effective this would really be.

I want to be clear here that I am just as disappointed at poverty porn myself, (and have said so here and here), but I think this comparison between an entertainment show and fundraising appeals is unfair and unrealistic.

What would be more helpful in progressing the charity world on from relying on poverty porn would be more examples of charities raising substantial amounts of money and support using positive imagery.

To start, I suggest looking at the way Charity:water fundraises. Right now their landing page doesn’t have a single image of sad looking people living in poverty. It’s the same story with their christmas appeal and even when they are informing you about the problems of dirty water, they manage to do it without a single heart-wrenching image.

Kudos to you (yet again), Charity:water